The Securities Exchange Commission has decided on its examination priorities for 2013.
These cover a wide range of issues at financial institutions, including broker-dealers, clearing agencies, exchanges and self-regulatory organizations, investment companies, hedge funds and private equity funds, and transfer agents.
“We are publishing these priorities to promote compliance and communicate with investors and our registrants about areas we perceive to have heightened risk,” says Carlo V. di Florio, Director of the SEC’s Office of Compliance Inspections and Examinations.
He adds, “Our examination program constantly seeks new ways to share our perspectives on key risks and regulatory issues so registrants’ senior management, compliance and risk managers, among others, can take effective action.”
The SEC wants to increase transparency, strengthen compliance, and inform the public and the financial services industry about key risks that we are monitoring and examining.
The examination priorities address issues that span the entire market, as well as issues that relate specifically to particular business models and organizations. These include fraud detection and prevention, corporate governance and enterprise risk management, conflicts of interest, and technology controls.
Read:
The priorities for each program are:
- For investment advisers and companies: presence exams for newly registered private fund advisers, and payments by advisers and funds to entities that distribute mutual funds
- For broker-dealers: sales practices and fraud, and compliance with the new market access rule
- For market oversight: risk-based examinations of securities exchanges and FINRA, and order-type assessment
- For clearing and settlement: for transfer agent exams, timely turnaround of items and transfers, accurate recordkeeping, and safeguarding of assets. For clearing agencies designated as systemically important, it will conduct annual examinations as required by the Dodd-Frank Act.
The priority list is not exhaustive and priorities may be adjusted throughout the year in light of ongoing risk assessment activities.
Senior exam staff, management from the SEC’s 12 regional offices, and other SEC divisions selected the examination priorities for 2013 in consultation with each of the commissioners, based upon a variety of information and risk analytics.
They considered tips, complaints and referrals from whistleblowers, customers and investors. They also looked at the information reported by registrants in required filings with the commission.
Further, they consulted data gathered from examinations conducted by the SEC and other regulators, and from communications with other U.S. and international regulators and agencies.
Read:
SEC seriously considers fiduciary rule